Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 15:10

What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Simple blood test detects cancer up to 3 years before symptoms appear - Earth.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Anyone think Andrew Tate can become prime minister of the UK with Elon Musk backing using X?
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What defines the k'vanna of the Book of בראשית?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why did Microsoft acquire LinkedIn?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
What made you feel disgusted today?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
$80 Xbox games seem like a steal compared to what I'm paying, and I don't like it - Windows Central
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Super Again: UNC Storms Past Oklahoma in NCAA Regional Finale - 247Sports
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.